Sir Fazle Abed -top 70 alumni networks & 5 scots curious about hi-trust hi-tech
2humaneconomics.docx download 2 page doc click through guide to world's most applied sustainability networks
WHICH OF FAZLE ABED'S TOP 5 PARTNERS women empowering CURRICULA INTEREST YOU?
post olympics updates:
- brief on 20 year dialogue- which 100 asian universities can sustain the world?
naosaka.com -let's explore how youth and most trusted coaches can take back practising adolescent and mental heath with economistsports.net and take back consequences of global summits at www.economistdiary.com
uniting japan, glasgow and bangladesh sdg youth in 260th year of machine maps by adam smith and james watt - related reference 10th year of adam smith scholars journal on only asian solution can save 2020s humanity
is it possible for youth to help un scale digitally as well as on ground - start with guterres twitter-designed organigram
abedmooc.com- a digitally tagged case library abed's legacy 6 by 6 alumni networks : 4 education,3 last mile health, 2 ending starvation, 1 ending poverty, 5 celebrating 100% collaborative/sdg productive communities; 17 everything other collaboration worthy of sdg generation innovating including humanising machine intel deeply and diversely in line with nature - not all versions latest= if something interests you most ask me email@example.com
yidan6.pptx 4.6 legacy of luminaries of education can solve any sdg crisis
82-72 foundations of billion women 6-dimensional nation building
ALUMNISAT.COM- VON NEUNMANN'S 60 YEAR LEGACY- by 2020'S WE'RE ALL ACTION LEARNING ALUMNI OF EACH OTHER ON SOLUTIONS COMMUNITIES NEED APP''D FOR YOUTH TO BE THE FIRST SUSTAINABILITY GENERATION - 37TH YEAR OF DEBATE STARTED IN OUR 1984 BOOK 2025REPORT.COM WITH 35 YEARS SURVEY WORK AT THE ECONOMIST
download latest hunicorns catalogue
|firstname.lastname@example.org writes: ever since president kennedy asked the head-fed to explore dad's 1962 survey in the economist, my diaspora scots family has compiled economistdiary ie 60 years -dedicated to our lifelong hero sir fazle abed who partner dec 2019- how did two thirds of humans -asians- end poverty spun by white empires during first 185 years of humans and machines - glasgow nov 2021 is last best chance for what glasgow university watt and smith intended to start up - the sustainable advance of all lives matter|
rsvp email@example.com to nominate a summit or a HUNIcorn- ie startup network too valuabLe for all lives matter for investors to exit or politicians to quarrel
. change? summit 2021 EconomistDiary..
?climate action nov glasgow 1 2
?education dubai dec rewired partners 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 x1
?education qatar dec wise laureaes abed & 6 5 4 3 2 1
?education hk dec yidan luminaries abed & 8 76 5 4 3 2 1
?education paris non varkey mn teacher 5 4 3 2 1
? aiforgood year round virtual geneva un - ops edu earth health ...
virtual earth day summit april - see recording
biden june in europe -g7 cornwall : brussels bureacratics .............................
25 hunicorns by abed
health HUNIcornsHH! Oral rehydration saves half of infants lives in humid villages increases village mothers lives 20 years;HH2 together with nationwide vccination network and- HH3 village doordash 10 basic non-prescription drugs served by para-health village mothers -main partners unicef , barefoot china medics hh4 tuberculosis and last mile ID partners kim gates soros
education hunicorns 1 lifelong 2 primary partner brit and commonwealth aid, 3 teen 4 university 5 internet partner japans number 2 cellular company 6 solar 7 early childhood partner lego, yidan, cambridgeu
finance hunicorns abed changed aid- 80% of brac funds grow and grow their outreach microfranchising businesses village mothers profit with unlike charity that often needs refunding; ultra is one finacial grant targeting 15% poorest graduation into ruing their own business partners cgap, nobel economist 2019 mit poverty lab; bkash is world's largrest cashless bank in number of customers; cit bank serves second generation villagers in city and their small interprices; brac international in netherlands systemises affordable remiittances as well as international brac hunicorns
food security unicorns- rice science ends starvation; veggie science gives vitamins infants need to prevent stunting; poultry and dairy design nation market leadership whilst value chain maximises livelihoods of villagers ...
meta since 1972 person to person
meta tech partners legacy - can 100 universities share their sustainability alumni's massive collabprations /innovations advancing human lot
can 100 million dollar climate bridge fund be designed round community piloted solutions across 10 countries https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dr-muhammad-musa-4638a8105_global-co...
Economist Place alphabet Africa America Asean Asia Bangla Europe Japan Russia Scotland Singapore in association with ecop26.com XGlasgow.com Games of WorldRecordJobs 2025report EntrepreneurialRevolution Astra.place
although maps of goal 1 ending poverty face many detailed challenges - if we could design a world in which every next girl/boy born has a good chance at life and livelihood - we'd be heading in win-win directions on all sustainability goals out of every community worldwide-
and at end of world war 2 over 80% on asia's continent had been left out of the machine age started by scotlands smith and watt-mainly because of how london had ruled so many waves during era of colonisation- with no access to electricity grids all development had to be linked in communally person to person- in poorest village asia most cultures left women to community build villages whilst strongest sons might work in city or abroad remitting back to the village
this index has taken 10 years looking at a lot of different projects empowering bangladesh village women -it can offer a detailed way of building very deep data connections/system flows if you value that sort of approach
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
in this compendium of rural human/economic development, we try to put some numbers showing how huge the bottom billion person economy built by half a billion womens empowerment is - but please note gravitational solutions such as oral rehydration saving up to a third of infants lives in humid villages involved education but almost no cost as a cure- so financially they don't show up in macroeconomic views of world progress- more generally almost all parenting work has zero recognition among macroeconomists who track GDPs; nor do their numbers track what we are doing to nature - so in effect the more carbonised GGP grows- the more nature is destroyed; if you can help us correct numbers we welcome that- but please note any errors are mine alone- they do not weaken the value of understanding the solutions mapped- also while these solutions could be applied in ay part of asia where dense populatinos share very little resources; it happens that in numerical terms most of this progress was done by bangladeshi and chinese village women- most times when they faced the next deep community challenge - they shared solutions freely- however there is a big difference- chinese villagers over time could rely on huge wealth being crated in coastal china whereas bangladeshi women have not over the last 45 years; this means that if you want to look for the deepest solutions you monitor what bangladesh women invented and svaled; but if you want to verify how over 800 million people advanced beyond 1$ a day poverty you need to study other opportunities china enjoyed that bangladesh did not
meanwhile most of the asian women end poverty miracle is next to no carbon but no credits for that have been given by those who designed globalisation up to 2020 -covid crisis year; also in real communities eg mothers take turn in looking after each others kids- these free but vital exchanges dont show up in monetary economies; we start the countdown in 1975-part 1 to late 1990s involves person to person trust networking with no tech; part 2 involves chances to leap when partners test micro-solar or mobiles
hg wells - civilisation is a race
between education and disaster
economistdiary.com today asians are nearer 70% of human race than 50% IN 1977- imagine what hell the world would be in without asia rising, beyond the colonial age which climaxed in world war 2 round currencies/trading maps of 7 white empires (uk us canada france italy germany russia totaling less than 8% of human race) plus japan -industrial revolution 1 and the atlantic hemisphere driven by english mindset had left almost all of continental asia out of 185 years of access to electricity grids and other machines started up by glasgow's smith and watt in 1760 -comments? any errors mine alone- firstname.lastname@example.org economistfuture.com
|Journalists, mediators and public servants should never be pessimistic about human growth exponentials -this has been a recurring lesson with each leap in 20th c media- because politicians get a choice what apps are licensed||it would have been easy to get depressed - kissinger had called bangladeshi villagers a basket case- 3 by one million disasters- cyclone, war, famine had challenges brac's grassroots village women networks but as you can see from this 1977 optimism that circles of women could lift up the sky was pervasive|
economistdiary.com today asians are nearer 70% than 50% IN 1977- imagine what hell the world would be in without asia rising beyond the colonial age which climaxed in world war 2 round currencies/trading maps of 7 white empires (uk us canada france italy germany russia totaling less than 8% of human race) plus japan -industrial revolution 1 and the atlantic hemisphere driven by english mindset had left almost all of continental asia out of 185 years of access to electricity grids and other machines started up by glasgow's smith and watt in 1760 -comments? email@example.com economistfuture.com economistwomen.com economisthealth.com economistgreen.com economistrefugee.com economistyout.com economistwomen.com economistblack.com economistbank.com economistpoor.com economistAI.com 2025REPORT.COM entrepreneurialrevolution.city livesmatter.city economistlearning.com economistuniversity.com adamsmith.app 21stcjournal of smithian economics
The very idea of microfinance has changed banking as we knew it. Providing small loans to the poor, mostly women, replaces physical collateral with collective responsibility. Today, microfinance is an established way to provide financial services to the poor. It can be scaled up in widely different environments around the world, and can deeply benefit the people it serves. It allows the poor both to take advantage of opportunities and to manage their vulnerabilities.
The focus of the innovations in microfinance has itself evolved. In the early days of microfinance, the focus was much more “social:” how to form groups in ways that would most effectively enforce collective responsibility? How to motivate women to form their own groups? How to motivate people to save for a period before lending them money? How to respond to negative responses from the better-off and the religious groups in a community?
Then, as the focus shifted from social questions, microfinance began to become more professionalized and was scaled up. Soon, innovations related to basic loan management followed. Along with the focus on financial sustainability, innovations in microfinance included better management information systems, and management systems that could increase productivity and internal control.
During the middle 1990s, the pendulum began to swing back to the client end, as criticisms of one-size-fits-all types of microcredit gained ground. The initial focus on product innovations in the credit domain was soon followed by a call to expand innovations to a whole range of financial services beyond credit, including savings, insurance, and money transfers. In this article, we focus on a different source of innovations in microfinance: using the process capital of microfinance to design innovations that can address a far wider range of constraints facing the poor.
We will also discuss the strategic linkages between microfinance and other approaches that innovators must consciously design into the package if microfinance is to be truly inclusive. To illustrate our argument we provide some examples from Building Resources Across Communities (BRAC) in Bangladesh.
The greatest power of microfinance lies in the process through which it is provided. Women form groups of their own choosing, known as Village Organizations (VOs) to engage with a formal institution; even this process reflects a significant redefinition of a traditionally very patriarchal contract.1
Moreover, staff members, who are of a higher socio-economic status, engage in a very meaningful act simply by going to the doorsteps of these women to do business with them, and seeking their help in solving problems; this practice begins to redefine the relationships within socio-economic hierarchies, and between formal institutions and poor women. In an institutional environment that is generally exclusionary, uncertain, unpredictable and at times openly hostile to the poor, microfinance staff follow a process that goes like clockwork: rule-bound and almost ritualistic, it opens up the possibility of a new culture of expectation and keeping promises through engagement between the poor and external institutions.
For their part, institutions create their own strong foundations as they learn the art and science of managing large-scale microfinance operations. They must engage with the details of developing systems and procedures, understand incentives and the psychology and motivations of staff and clients, and come to grips with the details of developing a performance-driven management culture and system that requires constant vigilance.
HARNESSING THE PROCESS CAPITAL OF MICROFINANCE: SOME CASES FROM BRAC
The process of providing microfinance thus creates new forms of engagements, relationships and capacities—what we term in this paper the “process capital” of microfinance. Traditionally, innovations in microfinance have focused on its financial domain: developing new products or new management systems or using new technology to increase efficiency. We argue that it is possible to better leverage microfinance structures and processes to facilitate other types of innovations to develop new services for the poor. The poor are a diverse group with diverse livelihoods, needs and potentials. Over time they encounter changes in their personal lifecycles, along with new opportunities and external shocks. The diverse and dynamic reality of poor peoples” lives and livelihoods forms the canvas against which BRAC conceptualizes and designs its repertoire of development programs, of which microfinance is a core element. More important for the arguments in this paper, BRAC uses the process capital of microfinance as an entry point to address other constraints and to open up new opportunities for the poor. We provide some examples in this section.
Developing poultry as a viable enterprise for the poor: Traditionally, women in rural Bangladesh have raised poultry, mostly as a subsistence activity and to manage small crises. In 1983, BRAC realized that, in addition to offering access to microfinance it would need to help poor women make more money from the activities in which they were already engaged. Poultry seemed a good place to start and BRAC began a series of consultations with villagers to identify major constraints. High poultry mortality, which villagers often took as unavoidable, emerged as a major issue. BRAC assessed the existing government services and found they were limited in both outreach and effectiveness. At first, it used its own staff members to provide wider poultry vaccination services, but it soon realized that much wider outreach was needed to systematically serve the poultry vaccination needs of a given area. Sustainability was also an issue. BRAC then developed the community-based volunteer approach. The idea is simple. In each village, an appropriate member of the village organization (VO) is trained to vaccinate poultry and treat basic poultry diseases. BRAC bears the costs of training. Trained vaccinators then get a flask to carry the vaccine, a syringe to apply the vaccination, and a bag with the BRAC logo. They buy the vaccine from BRAC or government facilities and sell the service to poultry rearers in the community. To get them started, BRAC gives each vaccinator a small loan. Today BRAC has over 20,000 poultry vaccinators working in villages throughout the country, responding to a very important need of small poultry rearers. Once these volunteers significantly lowered the mortality rate of poultry, another bottleneck was identified: yield. The average yield of local varieties of poultry is 40 to 60 eggs a year, but High Yielding Variety (HYV) poultry yield 250 to 300 eggs a year. The government was the main supplier of HYV chicks, and BRAC bought up most of its supply to distribute among its VO members on a pilot basis. Now, another major constraint emerged. Rearing HYV poultry is different from rearing local varieties; the farmer needs feed, clean water, and basic poultry hygiene. BRAC started training its VO members about these issues so that they could get the maximum yield from rearing HYV poultry. To facilitate feed distribution, BRAC used a model very similar to the one for creating poultry vaccinators. It developed a new cadre called “feed sellers” who were trained to prepare good-quality poultry feed that they could sell to poultry rearers. As HYV poultry rearing expanded, traditional middlemen started exploiting the women who were too isolated to get good information about local market prices. BRAC then developed a cadre of egg collectors, again from its VO membership base. As the women discussed the local market price of eggs every week at their VO meetings, it became harder for the middlemen to exploit them.
Livestock rearing is another popular activity among poor households in Bangladesh; here women also play a key role. Many BRAC members were using their loans to invest in livestock. On average, local breeds can produce 1 to 1.5 liters of milk a day, being milked for 250 days a year, but a 25% improved variety will typically yield 6 to 8 liters a day with a total of 270 milking days in a year. Clearly, improvements in livestock breeding could lead to significant opportunities. In 1985 BRAC piloted an approach similar to its poultry worker model to develop a cadre of workers to artificially inseminate cattle. The government was the main provider of insemination through its 1,100 Livestock Artificial Insemination Centers. Despite their numbers, however, the centers were distant from many of the rural households rearing livestock. This led to two problems: the expense and inconvenience of bringing livestock to these centers, and the problem of timing. A cow is usually in heat for 24 hours, and the optimal “heat period” only lasts about six hours. Due to lack of outreach, many rural livestock rearers did not know about the government services. Moreover, the government facilities relied predominantly on liquid livestock semen which required refrigeration and had to be used within three days. This meant that centers had to be located in areas with electricity and much semen was wasted. Or, if they used out-of-date liquid semen, cows did not conceive. This led to a vicious cycle of dissatisfaction and lower demand. After some research, BRAC developed another approach. Through VO members, it recruited their husbands or male relatives who had a secondary education, and trained them in modern methods of livestock rearing and artificial insemination. Its partners were Bangladesh Agricultural University and Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, which had excellent technical knowledge in this area. Initially, a few women were trained along with the men, but the work involved traveling long distances on bicycles, and administering the semen. It was more suitable for men. Instead of liquid semen, BRAC used frozen semen which had no expiry date but did need liquid nitrogen for storage. BRAC currently purchases liquid nitrogen from Bangladesh Oxygen Limited and distributes it in cylinders to its 55 Livestock Artificial Insemination Centers across the country. The trained Livestock Artificial Insemination Workers (LAIWs) come to these centers on fixed days of the week to buy the frozen semen. The LAIWs buy a single shot of frozen semen for 70 taka (roughly US $1) and provide on-farm service to the livestock rearers for 100 taka. BRAC provides them with regular training and the basic equipment they need. The average LAIW earns about 2,500 taka a month. The conception rate is over 65% which is higher than the internationally acceptable standard of 50%. Demand is rapidly increasing for the LAIWs’ services, so their income is growing. BRAC used posters, popular theater, and “miking” to publicize the LAIWs’ services and the importance of modern methods of livestock rearing. “Miking” is a very popular way to spread various types of information in Bangladesh, especially in rural areas. A rickshaw, bicycle, or scooter is decorated with posters and a microphone is placed in the front; it is then driven around the villages to make announcements. The microfinance VO meetings and networks are also used to.inform people about improved breeds and the opportunities they offer. Initially, to facilitate service delivery at the community level, BRAC used “post boxes” placed in villages so that people who needed the service could leave a note. With the massive expansion of cell phones in Bangladesh, BRAC is now providing the LAIWs with loans to buy phones. The name and number of the relevant village LAIW is displayed throughout the village and in the BRAC area office, and is publicized through the microfinance VO network.
Getting basic health services to reach the poor Many of the costly health problems faced by the poor can be reduced if basic information and prevention services are available in villages. And illness is a key reason for increased poverty and defaults on microfinance loans. The traditional MFI response to this issue has been insurance, which addresses the demand-side constraint of finance. But the demand side includes other constraints besides finance, such as knowledge of ways to prevent disease, or having the information on services available. Premium payment today for an uncertain event in the future for the poor when there are many other pressing competing needs, also makes insurance uptake by the poor a challenge. BRAC approached this problem by making basic health services available at the community level. Again, the microfinance VO structure played an important role. Appropriate VO members were selected and trained in essential health care. They were then assigned to work areas covering around 300 households each. Within their area they provide basic health information and advice, sell non-prescription medicines for basic illnesses, take pregnant mothers for ante-natal checkups, help mothers to immunize their children at government facilities, and mobilize the community for national immunization day. BRAC’s annual expenditure on training is 285 takas (about $4) per volunteer. The volunteers earn money by selling medicines at retail rates, and by referring people to health facilities. They can average 200 to 250 taka monthly.
Making rights real for the poor: BRAC’s Human Rights and Legal Services For the poor, especially women, a crucial constraint is lack of knowledge about their legal rights and difficulties accessing legal services when they need them. Without such knowledge, poor women can lose the few resources they have and become even more vulnerable within the society. Often when Bangladeshi women slide into poverty and dispossession, legal disempowerment is a key element in that slide. BRAC sought a cost-effective mechanism to address this constraint. It started from a promotive perspective, providing human rights and legal education (HRLE) for its members. It trained group members as cadre legal volunteers to provide this training to others. With the help of leading national legal experts, it developed innovative training materials such as flip charts to provide training on basic rights and essential legal issues in the areas of inheritance, marriage and violence against women. Each group member pays the legal volunteer about 15 cents (10 taka) for her services and BRAC pays another 15 cents. To maintain continuity, BRAC formed local Law Implementation Committees (LICs) consisting of the top three learners in an area; they maintain close links with other BRAC members. During 2006, over 10,000 HRLE classes were held for over 200,000 BRAC members. BRAC was well aware that once it took hold, this basic knowledge about rights would lead members to call for more direct legal action to support the poor. Indeed, BRAC soon formed a partnership with two leading legal-aid NGOs in Bangladesh to help BRAC members and other poor in the community resolve their conflicts through alternative dispute resolution. If women need to go to court, BRAC provides legal advice and assistance through a cadre of panel lawyers who are paid a modest honorarium for their services. They provide assistance with issues like polygamy, dowry, dower and maintenance payments, divorce, physical torture, and land-related disputes. As of December 2006, a total of over 42,000 complaints had been made and over 50% were resolved. So far, almost 3,000 cases have been filed in local courts, and over 35% have been resolved. The program has succeeded in obtaining about US $1.2 million in monetary compensation for its members in various cases. The fact that all these cadres of volunteer workers are recruited from the VO members helps in many ways. The VOs are the focus of BRAC’s delivery structure, including microfinance. Typically, a VO consists of 35 to 40 members who are formed into smaller groups of five. This structure provides a ready market for services, arising from the initial access to microfinance. Though most of the volunteers have little education and low socio-economic standing, they are members of the VOs and are trained and certified by BRAC, so their fellow VO members trust their services as they would not trust villagers outside the VOs. Fellow members can also hold them to account for their services more effectively than outsiders could. As their services became established within the secure and controlled environment of the VO, they can then extend them to market beyond the VO membership.
INCLUSIVE MICROFINANCE: NEW GROUPS, NEW SERVICES Making microfinance inclusive is the new mantra. The focus, however, is not only on new financial products, but also on designing socio-economic processes that create strategic linkages with microfinance. Because the various hitherto un-served groups face different constraints, they may require a wider set of introductory non-microfinance interventions so they can make the best use of microfinance itself. The key challenges here involve packaging and sequencing. Another is how to develop appropriate incentives and management systems that do not distort the process, but instead create synergies. In this section, we briefly describe several ways that BRAC is challenging itself to make microfinance truly inclusive.
Building opportunity ladders for the extreme poor BRAC has long realized how hard it is to address the needs of the extreme poor using conventional microfinance. In Bangladesh, where outreach to the poor and the poorest has had the greatest influence in shaping the discourse on microfinance, evidence suggests that about 15% of all microfinance clients are among the very poorest. This is not an insignificant result for BRAC’s outreach, and occurred mainly as microfinance expanded with the support of PKSF (Palli Karma Sahayak Foundation), the government-sponsored and donor-funded wholesale institution. However, work by BRAC’s Research Division2 shows that a significant portion of these poorest clients tend to be relatively inactive as participants. That is, they borrow far smaller amounts, and do so less frequently, and they tend to have long overdue debts that they cannot repay. Also, unlike most microfinance members, they are more likely to drop out of one MFI and not join another one. All this suggests that the focus of discussion on microfinance and the extreme poor should go beyond their simple membership in MFIs, to examining the quality of their MFI participation and how it can be improved. For BRAC the challenge was to develop cost-effective mechanisms to include the extreme poor in the programs and to move beyond grants. In 1985, the Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF) program of the World Food Program (WFP) was providing time-bound food assistance to the extreme poor living in vulnerable areas. To implement a new sustainable model for the most vulnerable, BRAC approached the WFP and together the two NGOs designed the Income Generation for Vulnerable Group Development (IGVGD). program to link extremely vulnerable women to mainstream development activities. This initiative organized extremely poor women into groups and provided them with skill development training in sectors, such as poultry, where large-scale self-employment can be created. While the program was operating, these extremely poor women were given a monthly ration of wheat for two years. The program also developed a savings scheme and later provided small amounts of program credit, so that the women could use their training to develop more meaningful and secure livelihoods. The whole program aimed to take systematic advantage of a window of opportunity in the lives of these extremely poor women: While they were receiving food transfers and had some short-term security, it provided support so that the women could stand on more solid ground once the transfer period ended. An independent study by WFP found that through this strategic linkage, more than three quarters of those who received the monthly ration card became regular clients of BRAC’s microfinance program. A CGAP (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor) study found that the average woman in the VGD program received a subsidy of about US $135, which is fairly small, considering that the overwhelming majority of IGVGD women graduated out of their need for continuous handouts. As more of the VGD women graduate to BRAC’s microfinance program and as they improve the quality of their lives, BRAC will likely be able to recoup these subsidies. BRAC’s experiences with IGVGD demonstrated that it is possible to create opportunity ladders out of the safety nets for those who are left behind by conventional microfinance. So BRAC became even bolder, and experimented further with this concept. BRAC noticed that the IGVGD approach helped the great majority of its participants to benefit from regular microfinance programs, but a significant minority still failed to reach this stage. More worryingly, those who failed to “make it” were among the poorest of the poor. They also saw several reasons for this situation. Sometimes, the local representatives selected participants based on political motives and other forms of selfinterest. More importantly, the VGD women often failed to get the full benefits of the window of opportunity that the food transfer provided, because two or more of them tried to share one VGD card. Sometimes, the cards had to be “bought’— which often meant selling the cards, in advance, to wheat dealers to raise the money for the “payment.’’ BRAC felt the need for a program that would give it more control over these processes; it also wanted to design a specific window of opportunity in which the extreme poor (those spending 80% of their income on food, yet not being able to attain 80% of the calorific requirement) could build solid ground and then move forward. In January 2002, to address these challenges, BRAC started a new experimental program, “Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction: Targeting the Ultra Poor,” or TUP. The program seeks to “push down” the reach of development programs, specifically targeting the ultra poor through a careful methodology that combines participatory approaches with simple survey-based tools. During the period 2002-2006, it worked with 100,000 ultra-poor women. The whole idea behind the CFPR/TUP approach is to enable the ultra poor to develop better options for creating sustainable livelihoods. This requires a combination of approaches; some are promotional, such as asset grants and skills training, and others are protective, such as stipends and health care services. It also means attacking constraints at various levels: within households and in the wider environments of institutions, structures and policies. The CFPR/TUP approach aims to deliver on all these fronts; BRAC hopes that the initial subsidy in this approach, which will be heavier than the IGVGD, will reap benefits by allowing the extreme poor to build a more solid and comprehensive base from which to move ahead. After two years of intensive grant-based support, the members of the CFPR/TUP program form their own microfinance groups. As of December 2006, over 15,000 CFPR/TUP members had formed their own groups as a part of the graduation package. BRAC has disbursed over US $500,000 to these members; their average grant is $38 and they have saved close to $366,000.
Microfinance for adolescents: Starting early The proportion of the population in the 15-29 age group is increasing in South Asia, including Bangladesh, due to an interplay between declining fertility rates and population momentum. This segment of the population will constitute the next generation of workers, parents, citizens and leaders. This “youth bulge” is likely to intensify further over the next two to three decades as fertility rates decline more markedly and the momentum in population growth slows. Some see the swelling numbers of young people as a risk. With rising enrollments in primary school, and growing primary completion rates, young people will create enormous pressure at the higher levels of education. A closely related risk is high unemployment and the associated vulnerabilities that it creates for young people and the society at large. Although this is one of the healthiest periods of a person’s life, it can also be a time of taking on risky behaviors that can injure one’s health. Still, these large numbers of young people bring unprecedented opportunities as agents of growth and social change. Along with the “youth bulge” comes a declining dependency ratio which presents a unique window of opportunity. The economic arguments for investing in children and dependent youth have never been better. Microfinance has traditionally focused on married women, usually aged over 25, while education programs typically focus on primary school children. Thus mainstream development efforts generally miss a critical and large part of the lifecycle, as people make their transition from childhood to adolescence and youth. But investing in people during this period of their lives can yield significant development dividends. Adolescence is an extremely vulnerable period, especially for girls in a patriarchal society like Bangladesh. As they reach puberty, many encounter abrupt physical restrictions that they will continue to face throughout their lives. Lack of mobility has far-reaching implications in shaping their mindsets, worldviews, aspirations and confidence levels; these, in turn, adversely affect their decision-making power throughout their lives. To address the particular contextual realities that face adolescent girls in Bangladesh, in 2003 BRAC initiated a special microfinance program for them: Employment and Livelihood for Adolescents (ELA). It aimed to provide ways that adolescent girls could begin to become economically self-reliant; eventually, it hopes to unleash a process of overall empowerment as these adolescents enter adult and family life. ELA offers its group members different kinds of trainings to help them earn an income and develop a savings habit, and it provides access to small loans. As of December 2006, over 272,000 adolescent girls had become members of ELA and formed over 9,000 ELA groups, each consisting of 15 to 20 members. Over 87% of them have taken on a loan averaging US $70. They have saved in total almost $3 million. In addition to helping the adolescents begin their journey in becoming economically self- reliant, ELA has recently begun to develop a social space called ELA Centers, where members can expand their social opportunities, become involved in other groups, and learn to act as social change agents in their home, family and community.
Reaching the socially excluded: Microfinance for Commercial Sex Workers For many reasons, commercial sex workers (CSWs) are vulnerable and socially excluded. Their lives, and their livelihoods, tend to be mediated by multiple layers of intermediaries who exploit them in many different ways. But they must rely on these intermediaries to protect them, given that they are so vulnerable, in terms of income and health, as well as socially and politically. Given the global concern over the spread of HIV and AIDS, various atrisk groups, including CSWs, are being targeted for different types of interventions. Generally these interventions aim to increase condom use, raise awareness and provide some treatment of various sexually transmitted diseases and infections, though less treatment is available for those with HIV/AIDS. Despite this initial support, they remain very vulnerable economically. In 2004, BRAC started a small project to increase condom use among brothelbased commercial sex workers. BRAC soon recognized much more deeply-rooted constraints behind the low rages of condom usage. It engaged in extensive consultations, and developed a cadre of health volunteers among the commercial sex workers who would provide basic health support and sell a range of health products such as essential non-prescription medicines, condoms, and low-cost sanitary napkins. In addition to these interventions, BRAC also works on the demand side; its awareness-raising activities include video shows, and quiz and popular theatre shows, at the community level and among students of schools and madrassas. At some of the consultation meetings, the CSWs began to mention how much they needed secure futures for themselves and their children. Among the needs they listed were schooling for their children, and safe places to save and to take out loans. This prompted BRAC to start microfinance for CSWs, with a key focus on savings.
As of December 2006, BRAC had managed to motivate over 50% of the CSWs in the six brothels where it is working to form their own groups to save and borrow. It has disbursed a total of over US $57,000 in loans to the CSW borrowers, with the average loan about $190. The members have been able to save over $16,000 during these years.
Financing micro and small enterprises The basic spirit of microfinance is to search for possibilities based on knowledge, understanding and perspectives that start at ground level. It is this keen and nuanced understanding that allows those involved in microfinance to select clients, segment markets, enforce loan contracts, manage loan repayment problems, and make everyday decisions. A good microfinance staff member has to be a barefoot economist, a sociologist, and a psychologist, all at once. When staff members can take this incrementally accumulated sense of life on the ground, with all its twists and turns, and combine it with the arts and sciences of management structures and incentives, they can facilitate successful scaling-up operations. This kind of spirit, and the organizational culture that nurtures and sustains it, is critically important in breaking into new market segments, especially when the segment is informal and unknown, like the micro and small enterprise market segment. Most of the micro and small entrepreneurs operate in the market’s informal segment, and lack the kinds of formal documentation that conventional financial institutions typically use for appraisals. These entrepreneurs have little or no access to traditional mechanisms of loan enforcement. Anyone appraising the potential to grow and repay loans has to take the person’s financial abilities into account using innovative means, but must also take on social tasks that conventional bank representatives are often not suited to do well. BRAC realized that a sizable portion of its existing microfinance clients were entrepreneurial enough to handle larger loans and grow their businesses; it also saw a large unserved market consisting of micro and small entrepreneurs. It knew that growth in this segment of the market was important for generating employment, which would lead to local economic growth. So, in 1996, it initiated Microenterprise Lending Assistance (MELA), a special lending program for micro and small entrepreneurs. As BRAC gained experience with the needs of that market and learned to manage its program more efficiently, it divided the MELA program into two segments: UNNOTI (meaning development) with loans ranging from US $215 to $715, and PROGOTI (meaning progress) with loans ranging from $715 to $4285. Like those in DABI (Daridro Bimochon—“Poverty Alleviation” in Bangla), BRAC’s core microfinance program, UNNOTI clients must form groups and attend meetings to take on loans, while PROGOTI clients are served individually. To receive loans, PROGOTI clients must open a bank account; however, UNNOTI clients only need a passbook for their transactions with BRAC.
As of December 2006 the UNNOTI program had almost 550,000 members, who had borrowed over US $180 million in loans averaging $250. Another 343,000 entrepreneurs are borrowing from BRAC’s PROGOTI Program in loans averaging over $1,000. Transfer at the doorstep: Remittance partnership International remittances have been creating a silent revolution in Bangladesh. According to Bangladesh Bank statistics, in 2005, the country received over $3 billion in international remittances, which grew by over 14% a year between 2000 and 2005. The importance of such a huge flow of foreign exchange at various levels of the economy is not difficult to understand. People use various methods to send remittances. A study by RMMRU found that 46% of the total volume of remittances was channeled through official sources, around 40% through hundi or unofficial channels, and 6% through friends and relatives. The remaining 8% was hand-carried by migrant workers coming home on visits. Most of the remittance flow is irregular, coming 3 to 4 times a year. On average, transfers sent through official channels cost almost $2 at the receiving end, but those sent unofficially cost about $1. With official transactions, people had to wait 12.83 days on average to receive cash after they deposited the draft in the bank, while it took only 3 days after they got information about the transfer when remitting money through the unofficial channel Clearly, there is great room for improvement at the receiving end, in terms of cost, convenience and speed of transfer through official channels. For providers of official remittances, a major constraint is their lack of an outreach network, especially in the rural areas, home to a large majority of those who receive the remittances. This is where microfinance institutions like BRAC, with its network of over 2,000 rural branches, can play a significant role, and it has now partnered with BRAC Bank, a full-service commercial bank. As Bangladesh has no official identification system, one key problem is identifying the beneficiary, which increases transaction costs for both the financial institution and the beneficiary. But BRAC could use its local knowledge; it carried out a survey to register close to 100,000 beneficiaries, providing them with a registration card, unique registration number, and remittance passbook. Through an intranet, the BRAC Bank Head Office in Dhaka is connected with all the branch offices; it can send transfer advice to the relevant branch office overnight. The registered beneficiary comes to the branch office with card and passbook, fills in a withdrawal slip, and gets the money within minutes. For each transaction, BRAC Bank sends BRAC a service charge of 175 taka (a bit over $2). BRAC Bank processes close to 35,000 remittance transactions every month, largely through this innovative partnership with BRAC. Although BRAC Bank is a very new entrant into this market, it already has an overall remittance market share of 4% and has been able to capture 35% of the remittances to Bangladesh that had been routed through Western Union. This partnership is not only about providing convenience, speed and low-cost transfers. To discourage people from using hundi, (because the money is unaccounted for, it can be used to finance drug business, terrorism etc.), BRAC Bank is using the popular theatre program of its Social Development Program, which runs over 29,000 popular theatre shows every year in the nation’s villages. A study by International Organization for Migration, having looked into the patterns of remittance use in Bangladesh, sees several factors that constrain the further investment of remittances in productive sectors. They are primarily areas where the country lacks resources. For example, Bangladesh has few resources for promoting information, advice, training and other services relating to investment in new and potentially successful sectors. It also has few ideas about investment opportunities, and those receiving remittances have little expertise in running businesses. If some of these constraints can be alleviated, conditions will improve for all parties involved, including the financial institutions involved in the remittance business. Then, larger remittances can flow more regularly and those who receive them will be more interested in other financial products. With this in mind, the BRAC Bank, in partnership with BRAC, is developing new products; one is Probashi DPS, a special deposit pension scheme for Bangladeshis working abroad. BRAC is also encouraging the registered beneficiaries among its members to open savings accounts and take out loans to start enterprises. BRAC Bank is encouraging the beneficiaries to consider taking out SME loans against the savings from remittances. BRAC Bank is also offering insurance, against accidents and disability, which pays out up to US $1,400. The policy is simple: it is valid as long as the remitter commits to making at least one transaction in 65 days. NEEDED: A BOLDER MICROFINANCE VISION Globally, given the huge un-served and under-served demand for microfinance and the lack of solid institutions, another large unfinished agenda exists: to ensure that the largest number of poor people can have reliable and reasonably priced access to different kinds of financial services. But we must also find innovative ways of doing more.What we have argued in this paper is that the process of microfinancing, through social intermediation, creates valuable forms of capital that remain largely untapped. From BRAC’s experiences, we have provided some examples of how the process capital of microfinancing can be harnessed to address other constraints that the poor face in their fight against poverty. New forms of exchanges are created, along with new forms of service-based employment, and poor people adopt new techniques that bring their enterprises larger returns. Decisions on how to implement these programs—should they be run by one single institution or a partnership, and how should they be sequenced—will depend on institutional characteristics, incentive structures and other contextual variables. In this paper, our purpose is not to prescribe, but rather to draw attention to the possibilities of using the microfinance structure and processes in bolder and more innovative ways. The current discourse on microfinance, with its exclusive focus on innovations in financial products, is important. But we see great scope for further innovations, if we take a broader perspective on microfinance, especially with respect to its process capital. Microfinance is certainly not a silver bullet, but it does have great power and possibilities. By broadening our current imagining of microfinance, we can harness it more fully and thus do far more to alleviate poverty.
The village organizations are the gateways and nucleus of all BRAC development activities. Typically, a VO consists of 30 women and is a federation of small 5-member groups. Each small group has a group leader and the VO members will nominate one of them to be the VO chairperson. The VO will also have a treasurer. Currently BRAC has over 170,000 VOs all over Bangladesh. 2. BRAC since its beginning has paid serious attention to evidence leading it to set up its own inhouse Research and Evaluation Division in 1975. This Division has over the years played a significant role in evaluating BRAC’s development programmes and identifying gaps for improvement. A number of new BRAC programmes, such as its special Program for the ultra poor, emerged out of research and evaluation. For more about BRAC’s Research and Evaluation Division
S1 how bottom-up aid networking began -Bangladesh Rural Advancement
Bangladeshi's , 8th largest population in world, were among the last to get independence in 1971. Henry Kissinger called this new nation a basket case - no capital of its own, densely overpopulated bur rural (meaning 90% had no access to electricity grids).
Fazle Abed had been born in the far north east corner of British Raj India in 1936. In !948 his people suddenly found that instead of one independent india they had become East Pakistan a colony of (wesr) Pakistan. This was a cultural division insisted on by the Aga Khan. There was no land border- and by sea you would have had to circumnavigate India. Pakistan had its own independence challenges-there was little attention to priorieies of those in East Pakistan. Aged 19 Fazle chose to go and study naval engineering at Glasgow University the place where the age of humans and machines had started up in 1760s around first engineer James Watt and first economics map maker Adam Smith. Abed then study chartered accountancy and by 1970, age of 33, he had become East Pakistan's regional ceo for the Royal Dutch Shell Oil Company headquartered in London. Then a life changing moment: a million people were killed all around him by the most intense cyclone. This changed the meaning of life for Abed. He returned to London to finish his contract, another million killing event occurred in his homeland with the war of independence. So it was with 16000 pounds from selling his flat in London and with a little aid money from oxfam- Team Abed arrived 1972 to help refugees build homes for 16000 families. Historically disaster relief agencies are invited in by a host nation, do immediate relief work and fly back out. What was different with Brac from day one - it was concerned with training locals. The local men were to build the one room houses- abed engineered a simple one room design with a pit latrine and small courtyard for doing the cooking. There was no electricity or running water. He used his unique logistics connections to ensure over a million bamboo logs were escorted up river. Thus homes for early 100000 people were built for about 3 dollars per home. This cluster of villages became a lab for testing microfranchises. Life critical priorities were food not to starve and health of infants and mothers. How could small positive cashflow businesses be safely built around the (mostly illiterate) village mothers and their community building ?
Unlike any nation in history, the national government had next to no tax base to start with. While it tried to sort out development of the capital city Dhaka, villagers across the nation needed to come up with survival solutions- in fact a million died of famine in 1974. Fazle was testing not only life and livelihood concepts for 16000 families around him but village franchise solutions that could replicates across 65000 villages of the rural nation. Agricultural food security A!, A2 and Health H1,H2 solutions for infants and mothers were the absolute priority. Fortunately village agricultural knowhow had been advanced by the American Borlaug - and East Pakistan's cholera lad had come up with a solution to save children and others from dying of diarrhea. While Oral Rehydration - a precisely blended mix of water sugar and salts had been discovered- the lab had no idea how to market it to 65 million mostly illiterate peoples.
A1rice science A2 veggies science H1 Oral Rehydration/Vaccine H2 Selling 10 simplest non-prescription medicat items village door to door
The idea that rural keynesianism empowered by women holding up half the sky was emerging in china - see 1977 report of the Economist. By now alumni of borlaug had shown rice in particular could be adapted to produce up to 10 times more locally - the japanese had found out how to do this , philippines and china were studying this, abed made sure bangladesh learned too. The other thing that excited him most was china's barefoot doctors movement. However the challenge with this was china had many more medically qualified people than bangladesh whose medical experts didnt want to live in the village. But abed had the advantage -the chinese were excited to learn oral rehydration and helped him specify 10 basic health prodcuts a village mother could sell door to door and only needed a days training to show how customers how to use. Thus the idea of a para-health franchise was born- each lady would serve 300 families door to door and make a small income with brac supplying the products to her. So brac could see how to develop 3 business solutions in its test region of 16000 homes
another veggie with vitamins
the 10 basic products
but a realy big deal was oral rehydration- if you could teach each vilage mother to do this you could save a third of infants who were dying of diarrhea before the age of 5, and by saving infants the cultural pressure on mothers to have large families so that two boys survived would start disappering. It was unicefs year of the child so fazle abed asked wherher ubicer would support brac in talking oral rehydration nationwide. once brac had proved it could do this, unicef head james grant wanted to become worldwide influencer on oral rehydratiobn. he asked abed can i di something else for you in retrn- abed said wuld you ask our national leader to join in nationwide vaccination - so it was that brac started having nationwide presence with ai rice science a2 veggie science to end famine and with oral rehydration serve the needs of infants first 1000 days as well as empower what became the microfranchise of 100000 last mile village health connectors
Health UNICORNS -sdg 3 HEALTH FOR ALL five catalogued
*Oral rehydration- the number 1 action-learning illiterate village mothers in tropical Asia needed to apply to save up to half of infants from dying of diarrhea- co-sponsors : national cholera lab, UNICEF James Grant; Chinese barefoot medics
*Nation-wide vaccination -co-sponsors UNICEF and government of Bangladesh
* 10 non-prescription drugs that village mother could “doordash” serving 300 households weekly; these para-health workers earned trust to increasing report deep but simple observable data eg on infectious diseases or on children’s lack of nutrition/stunting
*most efficient way to end tuberculosis
*wash program -lead partners include Unilever and subnetworks of UNwomen including first ladies and arts/ fashion designers for development
abed education hunicorns
*Lifelong skills training -brac’s first 15 years focused on village mothers- learning health microfranchises, ending illiteracy so that some could become village teachers
*Informal primary school- brac became world largest no-government schools franchiser- core to this were its play-text books and joyful relationship of peer to peer learning assisted by teacher as chief coach – British, Canadian and commonwealth aid
*Teenager skills and microentrepreneur clubs especially for girls immigrating into cities
*brac internet – gnet usa, kddi leading japan cellular company
*brac solar – see footnote 1
*Brac Pre-school -became in 2010s second largest non-gov schools operator- lead partners include Lego, Yihan luminary circle including Cambridge co-laureate with Abed, world bank
 Some will call this a failed hunicorn – almost every other network abed grew has a role as market leader; as an engineer abed needed to be in solar if only to enable mobile charging and to understand the fast changing systems economics; he wanted to avoid competing with the government’s potential to turn solar into a grassroots utility; we thetefor catalogue brac solar under the educatioinal compass of brac; we are well aeware that much of the villager awareness of Solar was connected by partyners of muhammad yunus;
abed finance hunicorns
*Microfinance for microfranchises
*Ultra graduation – for 15% very poorest who needed 2 years of grant of a productive asses and how to microfranchise it before using banking for poorest -cgap, Abdul Latif/MIT poverty lab, Nobel economists
*City bank – for small enterprises of 2nd generation family members immigrating to city; including eg grants and college scholarships
*Remittance banking and international assistance by brac out of Netherlands- by law a Bangladesh NGO must focus on funds for Bangladesh
*Bkash- world’s largest cashless bank for poor and in terms of population served: Bangla-American technologists led by Quadi family, Soros, MIT-Legatum, tech creator of mpesa, Gates, J Ma
*gabv.org global association of banks with values
aged health unicorns
Food security- sdg 2 six catalogued
*Rice science – lead connectors Borlaug food prize laureates, japan and constitution of IRRI with Philippines
*Veggie science – whilst rice is main carbohydrate ending starvation of Asia’s two thirds of humans- children need vitamins to end stunting
*Poultry- brac map 5 franchises in one turning national market leadership into value chain creating over million jobs for villagers
*Dairy – timing of this critical- only possible after EU stopped dumping powdered milk
*Cash crops including silk and crafts- roughly Bangladesh’s first 40 years depended on 3 sources of foreign currency- agriculture, remittances, girls as fashion-garment co-workers
*Cold storage and village-city logistics
by Abed’s last decade up to 20 national enterprises owned in trust for the poorest connected brac alumni with future skills and tech of the world’s purest micro-agricultural partnership economy
yidan prize the most exciting of all transformation summits for edu?
tencent co-founder charles yidan did something a bit different when he committed 100 million dollars to education transformation - like other summits he aimed to offrr an annual celebration out of his hong kong headquarters but he would also spend the next year both hosting regional celebrations of the most recent laureates, listening to next nominees and building various panels - here is his luminaries panel launched april 2021 - 15 brilliant system wide leaders of what to change in education 13 personally represented - two represented by nominees- can you think of any active panel quite like this/ tell us if you can
please share this 7 oct edusummit free virtually- its hosted out of cambridge by same network as celebrated fazle abed yidan prize europe - it positions itself as one of last edu summits before cop26 concerned with students 21-22- added bonus princess from netherlands the country which hosts bracs international headquarters; by the way yidan 2021 laureates will be announce week before - we then get 4 months to (re)nominate 2022 https://yidanprize.org/events/creating-an-equitable-future-through-...edusummitoct7.pptx
abedmooc 4.6 yidan/abed luminaries -where sustainabilty greaters fans of youth discuss whats education got to do with extinctio or sustainability