Part 1 of Top 6 Lessons for worldwide youth to celebrate BRAC and massive open online collaboration - BRAC net, world youth community and Open Learning Campus2024-03-28T22:30:32Zhttp://bracnet.ning.com/forum/topics/top-6-lessons-for-worldwide-youth-to-celebrate-brac-and-massive?commentId=4777346%3AComment%3A5516&feed=yes&xn_auth=noPro-Youth Economics Checklist…tag:bracnet.ning.com,2013-03-02:4777346:Comment:58112013-03-02T13:58:54.555Zchris macraehttp://bracnet.ning.com/profile/chrismacrae
<p>Pro-Youth Economics Checklist -if you wish more detailed references in The Economist to the following principles please coorespond with chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Keynes: The elderly economist poses the greatest risk to the future of youth. This is because:</p>
<ul>
<li>1 increasingly only economics rules the world (of man made systems)</li>
<li>2 economists are capable of exponentially designing or destroying the futures that 99% of parents most want…</li>
</ul>
<p>Pro-Youth Economics Checklist -if you wish more detailed references in The Economist to the following principles please coorespond with chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Keynes: The elderly economist poses the greatest risk to the future of youth. This is because:</p>
<ul>
<li>1 increasingly only economics rules the world (of man made systems)</li>
<li>2 economists are capable of exponentially designing or destroying the futures that 99% of parents most want life-shaping market (eg banking, energy, food, health and safely, education, land, media professions and public servants) purposes to serve</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="326"><p>Keynes, Schumacher</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="326"><p>Mediating Revolutionary Goals -eg Wilson, Sniith</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr><td valign="top" width="326"><p>Future History principles at The Economist since 1950s</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Never muddle principles of saving economics with balance of payments. Place can only grow if capital structures family savings as intergenerational investment in productivity of next generation out of every community</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The world wars of 20th c saw economists make short-term fixes to currency and other macroeconomic tools that need to be reformed before the first net generation integrates every locality into a global world. Next television and its advertising spots saw the end of economical public servants</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A catch 22 is the more social the consequence of a market (eg education, health) the less effective soundbiting politicians are at running it. Hence we need newly empowering models of privatisation</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Note values that industrial age economics has never directly counted - eg renewability of resources, peace , family's work in developing children. The future's greatest opportunity is to start counting them; its greatest risk is not to</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The only resources to afford planetwide quantum leap in human progress are cleaner energy, technology empowering smarter education (for lifetime productivity) for all</p>
<p> </p>
<p>World War 2 caused USA to start spending about 20% more of its GDP or arms and military. The opportunity to reverse this as soon as te soviet union collapses must be seized if USA is to be as positive economic player in start of 21st century as it was in start of 20th century.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>62 & 75 Nowithstanding this, Asia Pacific region is where the most massively underemployed populations have been locate to middle of 20th century. Everyone should celebrate 1976-2075 as Asia-Pacific Worldwide century.</p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="326"><p>Entrepreneurial Revolution principles at The Economist since 1972</p>
<p> </p>
<p>76 Sustainability of net generation is not achievable by 20th c largest organisational typologies. The required innovation search is the most exciting and urgent challenge to economics</p>
<p> </p>
<p>82 Urgent search needed for multiwin models:of value exchange (model of productive and demanding relationships gravitated by a markets purpose"</p>
<p> </p>
<p>84 Replace scarcity economics of thing production by abundancy economics of knowhow multiplying value in use.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>76 Celebrate million times more collaboration technology by 2010s than when man raced to moon in 1960s</p>
<p> </p>
<p>84 Borderless economics requites zero tolerance of externalisation economics even as all biggest professions of 20th c made money by externalising advice</p>
<p> </p>
<p>84 Sustainability's key metric spins exponentially into the future. Localities provide advance warnings of planetwide collapse in sustainability</p>
<p> </p>
<p>84 The start of the 21st century offers a chance to invest in youth being 10 times more productive everywhere. A nation's future should not be rated on how much debt its elders have got into but how fit its investment in knowledge-age youth productivity are. This should not be thought of as a zero-sum game. In fact, the greatest risk to man at start of century 21 will be seen to be discrepancies in incomes and expectations of such and poor nations. Uniting human race around inversing in youth co-producing millennium goals is core.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table> are you a friend of bottom-up…tag:bracnet.ning.com,2013-02-28:4777346:Comment:55162013-02-28T08:20:56.202Zchris macraehttp://bracnet.ning.com/profile/chrismacrae
<p><b>are you a friend of bottom-up economics?</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Bottom-up economics aims to free purpose of worldwide market sectors to integrate extremely affordable services needed by those who locally have the least or the least connections (eg illiterate, underclass, loss of cultural safety, at risk of digital divide ...)</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Discuss - Adam Smith was a bottom-up economist; Keynes warning on wars between 2 opposite types of economists ruling the world…</b></p>
<p><b>are you a friend of bottom-up economics?</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Bottom-up economics aims to free purpose of worldwide market sectors to integrate extremely affordable services needed by those who locally have the least or the least connections (eg illiterate, underclass, loss of cultural safety, at risk of digital divide ...)</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Discuss - Adam Smith was a bottom-up economist; Keynes warning on wars between 2 opposite types of economists ruling the world (of man-made systems)</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Discuss nature is a bottom-up system designer- how can any place every enjoy thriving non-crabon economy unless public servants advised by bottom-up economists</b></p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>True or false - the purpose of entrepreneurs since word was coined circ 1800is botto-up and about freeing every person to enjoy a happily productive lifetime</b></p>