BRAC net, world youth community and Open Learning Campus

Sir Fazle Abed -top 70 alumni networks & 5 scots curious about hi-trust hi-tech

GVM started about 1925 after Gandhi's last forum at the quakers house in london- since his conversion from a london barrister of law in south africa 1906, gandhi's peace revolution was predicated in change next gen's education system first then spend last 25 years of his life engaging elder's british constitution's reformation(something my grandfather spent last 25 years of his career on to) 

.small may be beautiful but in large newly independent developing nations, open education entrepreneurship is absolutely critical. this is our #1 finding after launching search for net gen's entrepreneurial revolution curriculum at The Economist in 1972- coming soon: why is this finding so future shocking

chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Foundation of Unacknowledged Giant DC 301 881 1655


 urgent millennials journalism project= world record book of job creators

online library of norman macrae-- 

Oddly after independence, bureaucratic indian government throttled education- whether village montessori still scales anywhere today in india is unknown to me: what is known is that fortunately a father and wife team started up GCM -  city montessori in Lucknow aroun 1960- now the world's largest schooling system run by one family _Mr and Mrs Jagdish Gandhi and their daughters Sunita and Geeta and ... www.cmseducation.org 

and to see village montessoris thrive go look at anyone of the 40000+ vilage schools connected by BRAC in bangladesh - the open education infrastructure secret of bangladesh's race tp end poverty

This thread serves to curate various obeservations from Lucknow and BRAC

Views: 52

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sunita Gandhi correspondence Oct20
A way to address the individual child in the schooling process based on the premise of competition with oneself, not others
 
Yes, there is one education person in the DC area who is doing quite a bit of dedicated work in the field of education and peace. He is Andrew Kutt, Principal and founder of the Family Oneness School, in Chevy Chase, MD. (www.onenessfamily.org). I think very highly of him.
 
I am briefly sharing herewith something which I have been developing for the last nearly 7 years which is quite exciting as a way to address the individual child in the schooling process based on the premise of competition with oneself, not others. It would be nice also if we could continue the process of innovations and creative thinking begun at the recent conference Global TIE (www.globaltie.net).
 
After working for 10 years with the World Bank and having traveled to and studied educational systems in over 30 countries, I believe small changes at the margins of education are not adequate to get the results we seek from it. The assumptions on which current education is based will have to be challenged. If the 20th century was the most brutal and the most murderous in human history (as per Dr Kofi Annan), how can the 21st century be different? What will trigger the changes? Why? Indeed, 'If we do not change direction, we are likely to end up where we are headed.'
 
Education is the primary sector where a change in direction is needed and which will bring about huge dividends. It is good that this year's Nobel prize went to Mohd. Yunus. I am also intrigued, however, that education has never really featured heavily in these and other awards except when in 2002, CMS became the world's first school to receive the UNESCO Prize for Peace Education. Indeed, if the future is within the four walls of a school, then why is it that schools typically do not assume their rightful role. What are the contraints?
 
Governments have become gatekeepers to the old in education with their narrow definitions and requirements of curriculum and teacher training based on the old premise. Every new teacher wants to perfect the old and do it better than others. Innovations are added to a core which is dysfunctional in its design. The state and national boards define human excellence in limited terms. Back end, the job providers do not feel education is meeting their present needs and hire increasingly for attitude which is also a random by-product of an educational process directed to material goals. Teacher unions dominate teacher mindsets. Indeed, where does one begin the process of change? If the top down processes, such as goverment policies are hard to change and will take time, can we explore some other ways to begin a process of change?
 
If we think of schooling as a tunnel of learning in which a child enters at some age and then emerges from at some other age, say from age 6 to high school, can we organise education differently within this tunnel of learning so that the outcome is different. First, therefore, we must define the outcome from education, as to what human and other outcomes we expect to see for each child, for example, is he a conscious and caring individual, is she able to appreciate beauty in all its forms, are they aware of the ethos in which we can see all individuals as part of one human family (away from flags, foods and festivals of a multicultural education that at best prepares children for tolerance but does not build the love which is necessary, recognising that we are infact part of one ethos and one world and appreciate this unity in diversity), ability to take ideas from inception to completion, overcoming difficulties along the way and becoming resourceful as human beings, ability to work in teams and also take on leadership roles, peer mediate and conflict prevent and resolve, be able to see the end at the beginning, and also empowered with right attitudes...this all along with core academic skills...which too need to be defined more precisely based on what the workplace new requirements are in the 21st century taking into account the need to create leaders and job providers, creative thinkers, social transformers and the like, and not followers, job seekers and limited thinkers.
 
In 1994, I came up with a model of education which is promoted through the Council for Global Education, www.globaleducation.org -- which provides a new basis for education that redefines educational content (and therefore educational outcome) to include four essential building blocks: Universal Values, Global Understanding, Excellence in All Things and Service to Humanity. It redefines, for example, global understanding to mean developing a love for all human beings, to recognising the oneness of the human family that goes beyond the 3 F's (flags, foods and festivals that we teach currently to develop understanding of diversity). It redefines spiritual and moral values to a consistent vision of values, the universal values that transcend cultural and religious differences, to focus on addressing the all pervasive spirit of each and every child, to nurture the human being to its highest and noblest form, to recognise the need for endorsing the desire of every individual to make a contribution and to serve through the educational process and beyond, to preserve the natural empathy that children have, and finally, to redefine what excellence means through educational process so that every individual is considered as valuable to a family, a society and the world and one who can provide value to each and therefore is already potentially capable. It means recognising that every student and those back benchers can each be a Mahatma Gandhi, if we could only see with those eyes and expect the highest from human potential, to redefine educational excellence as competition with oneself and not others.
 
At a certain moment in history, education must also act as a powerful instrument of profound social transformation and that time has now come. The very definition of what it means to educate has to be rethought and schools must have a new and expanded role. It will, as William Butler Yeats once said: "Education is not the filling of a pail but the lighting of a fire."
 
Since teachers rely so heavily on assessments and materials, I decided to focus my attention on these two aspects, which are doable immediately. It is for me a way to change the equation from underneath a teacher by making a programme for learning that redefines excellence. These new assessments and materials are based on a new premise, that of competition with oneself. These are completely values consistent with the new model of the four building blocks of education, endorsing these aspects in more than a few ways, but addressing the building block of Excellence in All Things squarely.

The project began as an experiment in Iceland at my charter school, Aslandsskoli, there. After developing it there and pilot testing it, I brought it to India where my parents' schools have served as a big laboratory for the same. The results from these assessments and materials which have been implemented for now 2.5 years have been outstanding. I am in the process of updating our website to share this in a proper way with others. This might take me another week to ten days but will be available in a more detailed form on www.gemsedu.org which also has the link to the work in Iceland.
 
Recently, the UK government has taken an interest in this new set of assessments and materials which I call GEMS (which stands for the Global Education Model of Schooling) with the premise of -- every child a GEM! They called a meeting of a hand-picked group of head teachers/principals at the UK's Department for Education and Skills, the DfES, at its Innovations Unit. This meeting on the 22nd of September was extremely successful and all the six participating schools have decided to undertake a pilot of the programme starting in January and completing in June. If there are significant improvements in student attitudes and skills, I believe there will be parties interested in taking this on to a bigger scale. In the meantime though, my dilemma is how to raise the funds to underpin this work with research from the beginning so that both control and treatment groups can do a survey before and after the pilot that takes into account both qualitative and quantitative aspects, and there are other costs related to running the pilot which I am not passing on to the schools because I want to do this so very much. I am also looking to find those individuals who can help me to figure out how to scale this up, so that masses in India and worldwide and begin to take this on as I believe this will lead to widespread change in the way we perceive education, inside out.
 
It is lovely to know about your father and I hope to study more on his life and to meet you dear 9 year old daughter one day.
 
With kind regards,

Reply to Discussion

RSS

KERRY GLASGOWIS HUMANITY'S LAST BEST CHANCE - Join search for Sustainaabilty's Curricula

101ways-generation.docx 101 ways education can save the world WHAT IF WE DESIGNED LIFELONG LIVELIHOOD LOEARNING SO THAT so that teachers & students, parent & communities were empowered to be ahead of 100 times more tech rather than the remnants of a system that puts macihnes and their exhausts ahead of human life and nature's renewal 2016 is arguably the first time thet educatirs became front and centre to the question that Von neummn asked journalist to mediate back in 1951- what goods will peoples do with 100 times more tech per decade? It appears that while multilaterals like the Un got used in soundbite and twittering ages to claim they valued rifghts & inclusion, pubblic goods & safety, they fotgot theirUN tech twin in Genva has been practising global connectivity since 1865, that dellow Goats of V neumnn has chiared Intellectual Cooperation in the 1920s which pervesrely became the quasi trade union Unesco- it took Abedian inspired educations in 2016 ro reunite ed and tecah as well as health and trade ; 7 decades of the UN not valuing Numenn's question at its core is quite late, but if we dare graviate UN2 aeound this digital coperation question now we give the younger half if the world a chnace especially as a billion poorest women have been synchronised to deep community human development since 1970

Dear Robert - you kindly asked for a short email so that you could see if there is a CGTN anchor in east coast who might confidentially share views with my expectation of how only Asian young women cultural movements (parenting and community depth but amplified by transparent tech in life shaping markets eg health, food, nature..) can return sustainability to all of us
three of my father's main surveys in The Economist 1962-1977 explain imo where future history will take us (and so why younger half of world need friendship/sustainable adaptation with Chinese youth -both on mainland and diaspora)
 1962 consider japan approved by JF Kennedy: argued good news - 2 new economic models were emerging through japan korea south and taiwan relevant to all Asia Rising (nrxt to link the whole trading/supply chains of the far east coast down through hong kong and cross-seas at singapore)
1 rural keynsianism ie 100% productivity in village first of all food security- borlaug alumni ending starvation
2 supercity costal trade models which designed hi-tech borderless sme value chains- to build a 20 million person capital or an 8 million person superport you needed the same advances in engineering - partly why this second economic model was win-win for first time since engines begun Glasgow 1760 ; potentially able to leverage tech giant leaps 100 times ahead; the big opportunity von neumann had gifted us - knowhow action networking multiply value application unlike consuming up things
1976 entrepreneurial revolution -translated into italian by prodi - argued that future globalisation big politics big corporate would need to be triangularised by community scaled sme networks- this was both how innovation advancing human lot begins and also the only way to end poverty in the sense of 21st C being such that next girl born can thrive because every community taps in diversity/safety/ valuing child and health as conditions out of which intergenerational economic growth can spring
in 1977 fathers survey of china - argued that there was now great hope that china had found the system designs that would empower a billion people to escape from extreme poverty but ultimately education of the one child generation (its tech for human capabilities) would be pivotal ( parallel 1977 survey looked at the futures of half the world's people ie east of iran)
best chris macrae + 1 240 316 8157 washington DC
IN MORE DETAIL TECH HUMAN EXPONENTIALS LAST CHANCE DECADE? 
 - we are in midst of unprecedented exponential change (dad from 1960s called death of distance) the  tech legacy of von neumann (dad was his biographer due to luckily meeting him in his final years including neumann's scoping of brain science (ie ai and human i) research which he asked yale to continue in his last lecture series). Exponential risks of extinction track to  mainly western top-down errors at crossroads of tech  over last 60 years (as well as non transparent geonomic mapping of how to reconcile what mainly 10 white empires had monopoly done with machines 1760-1945 and embedded in finance - see eg keynes last chapter of general theory of money); so our 2020s destiny is conditioned by quite simple local time-stamped details but ones that have compounded so that root cause and consequence need exact opposite of academic silos- so I hope there are some simple mapping points we can agree sustainability and chinese anchors in particular are now urgently in the middle of
Both my father www.normanmacrae.net at the economist and I (eg co-authoring 1984 book 2025 report, retranslated to 1993 sweden's new vikings) have argued sustainability in early 21st c will depend mostly on how asians as 65% of humans advance and how von neumann (or moores law) 100 times more tech every decade from 1960s is valued by society and business.
My father (awarded Japan's Order of Rising Sun and one time scriptwriter for Prince Charles trips to Japan) had served as teen allied bomber command burma campaign - he therefore had google maps in his head 50 years ahead of most media people, and also believed the world needed peace (dad was only journalist at messina birth of EU ) ; from 1960 his Asian inclusion arguments were almost coincidental to Ezra Vogel who knew much more about Japan=China last 2000 years ( additionally  cultural consciousness of silk road's eastern dynamics not golden rule of Western Whites) and peter drucker's view of organisational systems
(none of the 10 people at the economist my father had mentored continued his work past 1993- 2 key friends died early; then the web turned against education-journalism when west coast ventures got taken over by advertising/commerce instead of permitting 2 webs - one hi-trust educational; the other blah blah. sell sell .sex sell. viral trivial and hate politicking)
although i had worked mainly in the far east eg with unilever because of family responsibilities I never got to china until i started bumping into chinese female graduates at un launch of sdgs in 2015- I got in 8 visits to beijing -guided by them around tsinghua, china centre of globalisation, a chinese elder Ying Lowrey who had worked on smes in usa for 25 years but was not jack ma's biographer in 2015 just as his fintech models (taobao not alibaba) were empowering villagers integration into supply chains; there was a fantastic global edutech conference dec 2016 in Tsinghua region (also 3 briefings by Romano Prodi to students) that I attended connected with  great womens education hero bangladesh's fazle abed;  Abed spent much of hs last decade hosting events with chinese and other asian ambassadors; unite university graduates around sdg projects the world needed in every community but which had first been massively demonstrated in asia - if you like a version of schwarzman scholars but inclusive of places linking all deepest sustainability goals challenges 
and i personally feel learnt a lot from 3 people broadcasting from cgtn you and the 2 ladies liu xin and  tian wei (they always seemed to do balanced interviews even in the middle of trump's hatred campaigns), through them I also became a fan of father and daughter Jin at AIIB ; i attended korea's annual general meet 2017 of aiib; it was fascinating watching bankers for 60 countries each coming up with excuses as to why they would not lead on infrastructure investments (even though the supercity economic model depends on that)
Being a diaspora scot and a mathematician borders (managers who maximise externalisation of risks) scare me; especially rise of nationalist ones ;   it is pretty clear historically that london trapped most of asia in colomisdation ; then bankrupted by world war 2 rushed to independence without the un or anyone helping redesign top-down systems ; this all crashed into bangladesh the first bottom up collaboration women lab ; ironically on health, food security, education bangladesh and chinese village women empowerment depended on sharing almost every village microfranchise between 1972 and 2000 especially on last mile health networking
in dads editing of 2025 from 1984 he had called for massive human awareness by 2001 of mans biggest risk being discrepancies in incomes and expectations of rich and poor nations; he suggested that eg public broadcast media could host a reality tv end poverty entrepreneur competition just as digital media was scaling to be as impactful as mass media
that didnt happen and pretty much every mess - reactions to 9/11, failure to do ai of epidemics as priority from 2005 instead of autonomous cars, failure to end long-term carbon investments, subprime has been rooted in the west not having either government nor big corporate systems necessary to collaboratively value Asian SDG innovations especially with 5g
I am not smart enough to understand how to thread all the politics now going on but in the event that any cgtn journalist wants to chat especially in dc where we could meet I do not see humans preventing extinction without maximising chinese youth (particularly womens dreams); due to covid we lost plans japan had to relaunch value of female athletes - so this and other ways japan and china and korea might have regained joint consciousness look as if they are being lost- in other words both cultural and education networks (not correctly valued by gdp news headlines) may still be our best chance at asian women empowerment saving us all from extinction but that needs off the record brainstorming as I have no idea what a cgtn journalist is free to cover now that trump has turned 75% of americans into seeing china as the enemy instead of looking at what asian policies of usa hurt humans (eg afghanistan is surely a human wrong caused mostly by usa); a; being a diaspora scot i have this naive idea that we need to celebrate happiness of all peoples an stop using media to spiral hatred across nations but I expect that isnt something an anchor can host generally but for example if an anchor really loves ending covid everywhere then at least in that market she needs to want to help united peoples, transparency of deep data etc

2021 afore ye go to glasgow cop26-

please map how and why - more than 3 in 4 scots earn their livelihoods worldwide not in our homeland- that requires hi-trust as well as hi-tech to try to love all cultures and nature's diversity- until mcdonalds you could use MAC OR MC TO identify our community engaging networks THAT SCALED ROUND STARTING UP THE AGE OF HUMANS AND MACHINES OF GKASGOW UNI 1760 1 2 3 - and the microfranchises they aimed to sustain  locally around each next child born - these days scots hall of fame started in 1760s around   adam smith and james watt and 195 years later glasgow engineering BA fazle abed - we hope biden unites his irish community building though cop26 -ditto we hope kamalA values gandhi- public service - but understand if he or she is too busy iN DC 2021 with covid or finding which democrats or republicans or american people speak bottom-up sustainable goals teachers and enrrepreneurs -zoom with chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk if you are curious - fanily foundation of the economist's norman macrae- explorer of whether 100 times more tehc every decade since 1945 would end poverty or prove orwell's-big brother trumps -fears correct 2025report.com est1984 or the economist's entreprenerialrevolutionstarted up 1976 with italy/franciscan romano prodi

help assemble worldrecordjobs.com card pack 1in time for games at cop26 glasgow nov 2021 - 260th year of machines and humans started up by smith and watt- chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk- co-author 2025report.com, networker foundation of The Economist's Norman Macrae - 60s curricula telecommuting andjapan's capitalist belt roaders; 70s curricula entreprenurial revolution and poverty-ending rural keynesianism - library of 40 annual surveys loving win-wins between nations youth biographer john von neumann


http://plunkettlakepress.com/jvn.html

101%20ways%20that%20lifelong%20education%20can%20prevent%20your%20kids%20being%20the%20extinction%20generation.docx

© 2024   Created by chris macrae.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service